Help Stop Radical SSM Activists Obscenity-Laden Attempt to Corrupt our Children

Help Stop Radical SSM Activists Obscenity-Laden Attempt to Corrupt our Children

Wow. The video really boggles the mind. I thought the homosexual activists were purporting to be the poster children for love and tolerance. Now, the poster children are children with potty mouths--words given them to say by adults with an agenda to corrupt. Shame on any parent who allowed their child to be exploited in this vulgar manner.

Thank goodness for the birth of a child who has overcome all the filth of the world, and broken the bands of both wrong choices, and of death itself.

'Don't Ask/Don't Tell' Repeal is Not a 'Civil Rights' Breakthrough

It has nothing to do with "civil rights," but it has everything to do with furthering discriminatory, homosexual identity politics.

D.A.D.T. Repeal: A Few Things to Consider

"Warnings issued over rushing through DADT repeal"

Naturally, proponents of homosexual identity politics will use the repeal of D.A.D.T. to further their agenda to repeal the D.O.M.A., despite the fact that marriage is sexual-orientation neutral already, and the introduction of SSM creates havoc with free speech, the free expression of religious practice, and makes hay of family law issues. For those looking for links referencing these claims, feel free to browse through old blog posts, but might like to reference this article, regarding our Canadian neighbors, when studying the issue. Cheers!

Merry Christmas A.C.L.U!

Could it be that the ACLU's alleged onetime commitment to defending communism has shifted to an apparent commitment to defending atheism? It certainly seems like it, especially this time of year. And if the ACLU doesn't like that perception, it should change it.

Overpopulation: The Myth Debunked

Oh, this is good!

My large (7 people!) family gives these informative videos 7 thumbs up.

Why “Sexual Orientation” is Not a Protected Nondiscrimination Class

“Sexual orientation” is not an innate, indisputable characteristic, like race, nationality or sex, and instead encapsulates a concept based on changing personas and personal sexual decisions. The United States Supreme Court grants protected status to immutable characteristics, present from birth and has not recognized “sexual orientation” as a protected class. Therefore, to include sexual orientation is nontraditional as it compares to other nondiscrimination provisions. In including this protected class, the North Carolina State Bar would have assumed that every person is born with an inherent sexual orientation, a fact that is not widely accepted or scientifically proven.

_____

“One important manifestation of the principle of free speech is that one who chooses to speak may also decide what not to say.” When applied, a “sexual orientation” protection class would have violated the constitutional protection against compelled speech given to private individuals. The well-established rule against compelled speech and expression prohibits the government from compelling an individual- including an attorney- to express or affirm a message in conflict with his or her private beliefs. If the North Carolina State Bar protected this class, attorneys would have been forced to take cases contrary to their beliefs and therefore, violate expressive First Amendment rights.

Thanks to SSM, "Heather" May Get 3 Mommies

All of this brings to mind the old proverb: “When you take down a fence, you better make sure you know why it was put up in the first place.”

Thanks to SSM, the relationship formerly known as "marriage," stands to get really creative.

"Former Lesbian and Teacher Fights Homosexual Agenda in Schools" L.A. WILLIAMS

Why does the main-stream media never report on stats like these?

“The only reason that people believe we need hate crimes legislation is because the truth hasn’t gotten out,” Wall said. “We hear about it when a homosexual is a victim, but anytime a homosexual is involved in committing a heinous crime, the media hushes it up.”

She pointed to this passage from Citizen magazine’s January 2002 issue: “A study released by the U.S. Justice Department has found an epidemic of violence between homosexuals — far greater than the amount attributed to anti-gay hate crimes. From 1993 to 1999, the study found an annual average of 13,740 male victims of violence by homosexual partners and 16,900 victims by lesbian partners. By contrast, the Justice Department’s most recent (1999) numbers for hate crimes based on sexual orientation totaled 1,558 victims.”

This is definitely not a life-style choice I want taught in my children's schools as desirable, or on par with relationships (and the many documented benefits therefrom), shared by married men and women, each publicly committed to supporting each other, but also promoting responsible procreation. Promoting other sexual relationships (including heterosexual ones), outside the bounds of marriage, is unconscionable, and certainly does not have any place in our public education system.

Call Me "Old Fashioned," I Guess

I'd be tempted to laugh out loud, over this statement, if the consequences of the court actually upholding such blatant hogwash, weren't so grave.

Catholics for Equality? Homosexual Equivalency Activists Foment Dissent

Efforts to call homosexual acts morally acceptable and then force society to call relationships which are not capable of being marriages to be marriages is particularly egregious when engaged in by Catholics. Do not be deceived by "Catholics for Equality". Thomas Peters is correct "Catholics for Equality has decided to take their fight against the Church into the very heart of our sacred worship spaces." Expose and oppose their efforts and then pray for the conversion of their members.