Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Slippery Slop[e] of SSM: Promoting Sodomy in Public School

'Coming out' assembly concerns parents and rightly so. Consider that the school promised not to tattle to nosy parents:
"They also said that if kids want to discuss their homosexual issues, that their parents will not be informed of anything -- that it's completely private," Camenker reports. "And this was one of the things that really bothered this mother, that...if kids are involved with a dangerous and deadly behavior, the school isn't even going to tell their parents that it's going on."

Ummhmm. Defenders of man/woman marriage have long sounded a warning, that this exact behavior and duplicity, pitting the state & homosexual activists against the best interests of the children, would most definitely come to pass, once SSM is the law of the land.

4 comments:

  1. Your link between same-sex marriage and the "promotion of sodomy in public school" is poor. And by "poor" I mean non-existent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the state recognizes SSM, it must tacitly acknowledge that "Heather's two mommies," if lesbians, are probably engaging in homosexual behavior; thus, the greater opportunity for homosexual activists to promote their lifestyle, validated by their "marriage," in the public forum. After all, ssm is now just one of many "equally" acceptable lifestyle choices now.

    Thanks for reading the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And, from my friend, Euripides, this gem:

    "There's only one thing important to those beholden to leftist doctrine, that the doctrine must be propagated at all costs. Such doctrine steps all over the rule of law and, instead, becomes a law unto itself, beyond reproach."

    The radical homosexual agenda certainly qualifies as "leftist."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Fannie,

    I believe that ANY sexual behavior, outside the bonds of marriage, (which based both on religious beliefs, and upon thousands of years of anthropology, biology, custom, and common sense), I define as being strictly between a man and a woman, is morally wrong, physically risky, and societally unhealthy.

    I believe that all people are beloved sons and daughters of God, with a divine heritage and a divine potential, and as such, are worthy of being shown the kind of charity which God showers on me. By "charity," I mean, "the pure love of Christ."

    I believe we are all gifted with agency--the right to choose for ourselves, the behaviors/thoughts we'll engage in, but we are not free to choose the consequences, thereof.

    I believe all children have the right to be born into families, whose parents are formally committed to each other through the public institution of marriage.

    I do not believe governments have the right to redefine marriage as anything other than between a man and a woman.

    I wish you a Merry Christmas, and heartily defend your right to your own opinions, expressed on your own blog. I wish you all possible happiness and good will.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated. The Golden Rule Applies in all dialogue. I will not print comments containing insults to religious belief, vulgarities, profanity, or blasphemy. This blog is rated PG-13. If you feel you're being censored, consider raising the bar on the substance of your commentary. Thank you for stopping by!